<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No License? No Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ne0ge0.com/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ne0ge0.com/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/</link>
	<description>When I talk, the world ignores me...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ne0ge0.com/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ne0ge0.com/index.php/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know though. At what point down the line does the responsibility of what data is passed transfer from the ISP to the end user?
I mean, if the ISPs were forced to provide hardware with built in routers, are they going to give the user a choice, or is the choice left up to the user; forming part of the agreement that the user pledges that they will connect to the ISP with a device which has a firewall?
Anyway, I think were getting away from the point that however much the ISP can stipulate, the responsibility still ends with the user, and therefore it is they that are at fault if anything nasty has taken over their machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know though. At what point down the line does the responsibility of what data is passed transfer from the ISP to the end user?<br />
I mean, if the ISPs were forced to provide hardware with built in routers, are they going to give the user a choice, or is the choice left up to the user; forming part of the agreement that the user pledges that they will connect to the ISP with a device which has a firewall?<br />
Anyway, I think were getting away from the point that however much the ISP can stipulate, the responsibility still ends with the user, and therefore it is they that are at fault if anything nasty has taken over their machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cragdoo</title>
		<link>http://www.ne0ge0.com/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>cragdoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ne0ge0.com/index.php/2006/10/11/no-license-no-connect/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Surely the ISP has some level of responsibility , after all they&#039;re the ones providing the means to connect to t&#039;internet. More and more ISPs are providing routers/modems with built in firewall thus removing the need for the customer to know what a firewall is/does</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the ISP has some level of responsibility , after all they&#8217;re the ones providing the means to connect to t&#8217;internet. More and more ISPs are providing routers/modems with built in firewall thus removing the need for the customer to know what a firewall is/does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

